LEGAL SCUMBAGS



Big Brother is watching!

Several Fuckin' Feds, Judges and Shysters
are actually monitoring this site.
Fuck 'em!

-------------

The nightmare that began on March 23, 1993, when seven Keystone Cops camouflaged as FBI Agents tried to arrest me, ended at midnight on February 2, 1998 -- after almost five years of sheer terror by the U.S. Government Gestapo.

In this section, I present the complete text of "J'accuse: An Open Letter to Janet Reno" from Maledicta 11. You know, my satirical and sarcastic letter to that horrible harridan with the Hitler haircut who heads our infernal U.S. Department of Injustice.

Also, various legal scumbags will be featured and exposed, especially the shysters, judges and assorted legal riffraff who have shafted Good Old Uncle Mal, no thanks to his ex-wife from hell, Shirley Beischel Aman.

Of course, I had to be careful as long as I was on the Federal choke-chain known as "probation" and "supervised release." Wonderful tough-on-crime Federal Chief Justice Scatmüller insisted that I be a good boy until February 3, 1998, or else he would find another sneaky way to shut me up again and return me to the slammer. If I got just a parking ticket, the foul Feds could have misused this as a "violation" of my probation conditions and put me behind bars for another five years. . . .

Legal scum know and misuse all sorts of loopholes and obscure laws to deny Freedom of Speech to anyone who is gutsy enough to expose and openly ridicule rotten shysters, black-robed swine, and other members of the Legal Mafia & Mutual Protection Society.

Long Live the First Amendment!

Some of my best friends are lawyers and judges, but ...
the following are incompetent, stupid, lazy, lying, devious,
hypocritical, sanctimonious, morally corrupt,
backstabbing and/or nasty

Legal Scum.

The following list will be explained in due time. Meanwhile ...

Piss on them!

images/piss Left Janet images/piss Right images/piss Left Reno images/piss Right

images/piss Left
Judge images/piss Right images/piss Left Zick images/piss Right

Judge images/piss Right images/piss Left Becker

Judge images/piss Right Pike

Judge Anderson

Judge Nettesheim

Judge Snyder

Judge Heffernan

Judge Crivello

Judge Eich

Judge Scatmüller

Judge Posner

Judge Hill

Judge Ripple

Attorney Melnick

Attorney Cappozzo

Attorney Wimmer

Attorney Sternberg

Attorney Caldwell

Attorney Appel

Attorney Phillips

Attorney Alexander

Attorney O'Brian

Attorney Schoone

Attorney Schmitz

Attorney Hansen

Attorney Carroll

Attorney Koesser


So sue me, legal scumbags!



Judge Stadtmueller Denies Petitions

Cautious friends with more common sense than I urged me not "to get into pissing contests with skunks"; that is, not to expose and ridicule lawyers and judges, as deserving as such legal scum may be. "Keep your mouth shut until you're off probation," they warned me.

But I didn't. The waste of tax dollars, the vindictiveness of deified shysters (i.e., judges) and the nastiness of such little soulless creatures has to be rubbed into their faces again and again. Not that it does any good, as most members of the Legal Mafia are protected beyond belief. At the worst, little old Scatmüller can find another obscure law to put me back in prison for several years. If I get sprayed again with skunk piss, at least I'll have the satisfaction of having spiritually kicked them in their atrophied little balls. That's worth doing time in the slammer.

Scatmüller is vindictive because his sentence was partially overturned by his buddies at the Chicago Appeals Court -- that's such a blow to a judge's immense ego. He's also pissed off at me because I never showed any remorse for my "crimes" and did not perform the expected spectacle of tearfully apologizing to my so-called victims, who should rot in the hottest pits of hell.

So, Scatmüller recently denied again my second request for early release from this silly probation just to show me what a powerful little god he is and to please his buddies in Wisconsin. To justify his denial, he paraded seven reasons why I had to stay on the Federal choke-chain until the last day, so he would be able to yank me back into the arms of the Bureau of Prisons if I got just a parking ticket while on probation.

I am saving the juicy parts of my official complaints against Scatmüller & Co. until my Cat-Man of Lompoc book is published. I just post here this example of Merkin Justice for the world to see and for my private amusement.

If Scatmüller were a fair, decent and impartial judge, he could have released me from probation on February 3, 1996. But nooooooo, tough-on-crime Jay Pee wanted me under his gavel until the last possible date, February 3, 1998. Thanks, Chief Judge! Everyone admires a Little Toughie like you.


UNITED  STATES  DISTRICT  COURT
EASTERN  DISTRICT  OF  WISCONSIN

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,

v.                                                         Case No. 93-CR-65

REINHOLD AMAN,
Defendant.


ORDER

On July 4, 1993 following a jury trial Reinhold Aman was found guilty of three counts of mailing threatening communications and on September 17, 1993, he was sentenced to a term of 27 months custody of the Bureau of Prisons on each of the three counts to run concurrently for a total term imprisonment of 27 months. Following release from imprisonment Aman was ordered to serve a three year term of supervised release as to each count, again to run concurrently, for a total of three years of supervised release. On October 7, 1994, following the court of appeals remand of the defendant's case for resentencing, the court imposed a term of 18 months imprisonment as to each of the three counts to run concurrent with one another for a total term of imprisonment of 18 months. The defendant received credit for time served and following his release from imprisonment he was placed on supervised release on February 3, 1995 for a three year term as to each of the three counts of conviction to run concurrently.

On April l9, 1997, Aman requested early discharge from the unexpired term of supervised release which is currently due to expire in early February 1998. The government opposes early discharge in this case.

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(1) the court may, after considering the factors set forth in §§ 3553(a)(1), (a)(2)(B), (a)(2)(C), (a)(2)(D), (a)(4), (a)(5) and (a)(6), terminate a term of supervised release and discharge the defendant released at any time after the expiration of one year of supervised release, pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure relating to the modification of probation, if it is satisfied that such action is warranted by the conduct of the defendant released and the interest of justice.

Essentially, the court is to
(1) consider the nature and circumstances of the offense and the history and characteristics of the defendant (18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(1));

(2) to afford adequate deterrence to criminal conduct (18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(2)(B));

(3) to protect the public from further crimes of the defendant (18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(2)(C));

(4) to provide the defendant with needed educational or vocational training, medical care, or other correctional treatment in the most effective manner (18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(2)(D));

(5) the kinds of sentence and the sentencing range established for the applicable category of offense committed by the applicable category of defendant as set forth in the sentencing guidelines (18 U.S.C. § 3353(a)(4)(A));

(6) any pertinent policy statement issued by the Sentencing Commission (18 U.S.C. § 3353(a)(5));

(7) the need to avoid unwarranted sentence disparities among defendants with similar records who have been found guilty of similar conduct (18 U.S.C. § 3353(a)(6)).

Based upon the court's review of the presentence report
[an incredibly libelous and distorted document produced with the help of lying U.S. Attorneys, lying and paranoid Judge Becker, lying and back-stabbing shyster Karen Appel, lying ex-wife Shirley, and gullible FBI agents], together with the parties' positions with respect to early discharge, and balancing the factors the court ought consider, I find that the first, second, fourth, fifth and seventh factors all counsel against granting Mr. Aman's request for early discharge. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the defendant's request for early discharge, be and the same is hereby DENIED.

Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin this 12th day of June, 1997.

BY THE COURT:
Scat's Egomaniacal Signature


Nice and modest signature, Judge!
Oh, dear, what would Sigmund Freud say about your over-inflated ego and obvious anal-retentiveness?



I did not give up but on August 3, 1997, sent Scatmüller the following petition, which Little Toughie ignored, of course.


The Hon. J. P. Stadtmueller
U.S. District Chief Judge
471 U.S. Courthouse
517 East Wisconsin Avenue
Milwaukee, WI 53202

P E T I T I O N
F O R   T E R M I N A T I O N   O F   P R O B A T I O N


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
REINHOLD AMAN,
Defendant.

Case No. 93-CR-65


Judge Stadtmueller:

On June 12, 1997, you ordered that my request for early discharge be denied. Your Order cited seven standard reasons, of which you agreed with five why I must, according to you, remain on probation until February 3, 1998.

Permit me to comment on the five reasons you supported. Your text is shown in boldface.

Essentially, the court is to
(1) consider the nature and circumstances of the offense and the history and characteristics of the defendant (18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(1))


This is not a pertinent reason to deny my request: I am not a murderer, rapist, child molester, drug smuggler, or bank robber. My "offense" was mailing two prank postcards and one pamphlet.

(2) to afford adequate deterrence to criminal conduct (18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(2)(B))

This is not a pertinent reason to deny my request: Seven more months of punitive and destructive probation will change nothing. I will not act differently whether I am on probation or not.

(4) to provide the defendant with needed educational or vocational training, medical care, or other correctional treatment in the most effective manner (18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(2)(D))

This is not a pertinent reason to deny my request: Neither in prison nor while on probation have I ever received any educational or vocational training, or other correctional treatment, and I will receive none during the last seven months.

(5) the kinds of sentence and the sentencing range established for the applicable category of offense committed by the applicable category of defendant as set forth in the sentencing guidelines (18 U.S.C. § 3353(a)(4)(A))

This is not a pertinent reason to deny my request: "[A] plea bargain or a trial should yield about the same result." Neil Weiner (Princeton's Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs). The Government's plea bargain offer was only six months' probation and no prison term; I was punished with almost 16 months in prison, three years' probation and seven months of home detention, for which I have never received one day of credit.

(7) the need to avoid unwarranted sentence disparities among defendants with similar records who have been found guilty of similar conduct (18 U.S.C. § 3353(a)(6))

This is not a pertinent reason to deny my request: Federal Judges have the freedom to grant early release from probation after one year served, if they want to.

Based upon the court's review of the presentence report:

This is not a pertinent reason to deny my request: The presentence report is a distortion of facts, tainted with lies by Government Attorneys to the Grand Jury, lies by Judge Marianne Becker, my unethical and unprofessional Attorney Karen Appel, and my ex-wife Shirley Aman, perjury at the trial by witnesses, and severe conflict of interest by various legal parties in Milwaukee.

together with the parties' positions with respect to early discharge:

This is not a pertinent reason to deny my request: It makes no difference to my so-called victims whether I am on probation or not, except to give them the sadistic pleasure of knowing that the Government continues to humiliate me for seven more months.

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3583(e)(1) the court may, after considering the factors set forth in 3553(a)(1), (a)(2)(B), (a)(2)(C), (a)(2)(D), (a)(4), (a)(5) and (a)(6), terminate a term of supervised release and discharge the defendant released at any time after the expiration of one year of supervised release, pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure relating to the modification of probation, if it is satisfied that such action is warranted by the conduct of the defendant released and the interest of justice.

Such action, releasing me from probation now, certainly is warranted by my flawless conduct in prison and during the entire probation period. It is also in the interest of justice to end this cruel, sadistic punishment and waste of taxpayers' dollars now, as it serves absolutely no purpose except to continue humiliating and punishing me beyond reason, and to please certain sadistic individuals in Wisconsin.

I don't have the money to hire a competent lawyer to cite legal precedents and paragraphs to challenge your Order. Instead, I wish to point out to Your Honor the following travesties of justice in my case and appeal to your sense of justice and fairness to consider the following and grant me release from the punitive probation now:

(1) My case was mishandled by the two lazy and incompetent court-appointed lawyers, Geoffrey Hansen of San Francisco and John Miller Carroll of Milwaukee. Hansen refused to help the utterly incompetent Carroll and refused to petition for a change of venue to the San Francisco Federal Court because he preferred traveling around the country giving lectures to lawyers.

(2) My naïvété as to legal matters, trusting that both lawyers would do their best to defend me. Instead, both provided inferior guidance, were incompetent, and abandoned me as soon as I was imprisoned.

(3) John Miller Carroll never involved me in any pretrial conference (via telephone). Only after he had met with Francis Schmitz and made his deals with him did he inform me of the results.

(4) Carroll never told me that I would actually have to serve time in prison until the day you sentenced me, causing a mild heart attack, followed by an angioplasty in Milwaukee.

(5) Carroll refused to petition for a change of venue to the San Francisco Federal Court because he wanted "federal experience" in your court, misusing me in an unprofessional, despicable way.

(6) Carroll did not want me to accept Schmitz's plea bargain of a mere six months' probation but talked me into a trial because "we can't lose" and he wanted "federal experience."

Your Honor, do you understand the enormity of Carrollís callousness, lack of ethics, and professional misconduct which resulted in my imprisonment? He misused me and endangered my life so that he could get experience in your court. Doesn't such a travesty of justice and callous misconduct by Carroll influence your thinking at all? Doesn't the unethical misconduct by that incompetent lawyer Carroll bother you at all?

Further, federal judges in some districts give full credit for home detention, deducting the time from the actual prison sentence. I was punished for seven months with severely restricted home detention but never received one day of credit toward my prison sentence or probation.

I am asking that you demonstrate fairness by deducting the seven months of home detention I served from the seven months left of my probation and that you order this cruel probation to be terminated now, so that I can resume my normal life and business.

Very truly yours,
(signed)
Reinhold Aman
pro se


Time Wounds All Heels
Drunk and Lying Judges

Editor's Note: It's such a pleasure seeing black-robed bastards and bitches knocked off their high horses, especially if they belong to the Wisconsin Legal Mafia that ruthlessly fucked me over. The cesspool of immorality and hypocrisy officially known as the Waukesha County Court House is the work place of "Judge" Marianne Becker, that paranoid, nasty and stupid bitch who shafted me mercilessly. I've added some comments in square brackets.

Alcoholic
On 6 July 1997, Waukesha County Court Commissioner Sallie Rubenzer, 37, knocked over a tree with her car, then fled the accident. During sobriety tests administered by arresting police, she could neither recite the alphabet nor count backward, officials said. She also missed her nose when asked to touch it with her index finger on three of four attempts. Rubenzer told officers that she had not been drinking and indicated that she was on asthma medication. [Lying bitch!]. Her blood-alcohol level registered 0.235%. [0.10% is considered evidence of intoxication in Wisconsin] "She stated that I had really fucked up her life and her career," Officer Wallschlaeger wrote in his report. [The cowardly Milwaukee Urinal printed '(expletive) up,' of course.]

One of her drinking buddies, Joseph Patterson, told the police that while Rubenzer's vehicle was parked in the driveway, an unknown person had pulled into the driveway and struck her car and then sped off.
[What a goddamn liar!]

Rubenzer was not on the bench next day. She called in sick, complaining of problems with asthma [
Lying bitch!], Family Court Commissioner David Pike said. [Pike is, in my opinion, an alcoholic wimp who fucked me over twice. Shyster Foullips treated him like a little moron in court.]

Waukesha County Chief Judge Mark Gempeler said Rubenzer, who earns $61,350 a year, will not face an immediate suspension and could return to the bench.
[Good boy, Mark! Just keep protecting your unfit colleagues like your buddies protected that Bitch Becker.]

Besides a drunken driving citation, Rubenzer faces other traffic citations, including hit-and-run driving, driving too fast for conditions, failure to notify police, and unreasonable and imprudent speed, according to Town of Oconomowoc Police Chief Thomas Gukich.

On 1 Feb. 97, police were called to Rubenzer's home. Police arrived to find a "burned counter top and a burned-up toaster in the back yard." Rubenzer at first denied knowing what happened
[Lying bitch!] , but later admitted using the toaster to light a cigarette, leaving it on and going to bed. Rubenzer appeared "very 10-59," which is police code for "intoxicated".

Rubenzer was confronted by the chief judge about a possible drinking problem after he had received reports that she exuded "an odor of alcohol" while working.

On 25 April 97, Rubenzer was drunk again with two friends. One of them, Susan Patterson, was loud, argumentative and continually swearing obscenities at the police and her friends. Police eventually arrested Patterson, who resisted while being handcuffed and had to be forcibly removed from the house. Patterson was cited for disorderly conduct. (Source: Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, July 8-15, 1997)

My suggestion: Appoint Rubenzer to the Wisconsin Supreme Court -- there's already a perfect colleague for her: Judge Shirley Abrahamson, an allegedly "recovered" alcoholic.



Drunk
On 19 June 1996, Wisconsin Appeals Court Judge Harry G. Snyder was arrested and pleaded guilty to drunken driving. Snyder's blood-alcohol level was 0.17%, police reports said.
[Snyder is one of the three immoral motherfuckers who rejected my appeals and whitewashed and protected that Bitch Becker.] - (Source: Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, July 11, 1997)

Speeding and Lying
Illinois Supreme Court Chief Justice James Heiple in recent years was stopped four times by the police for speeding. On one occasion, he drove his 1988 Lincoln more than 5 miles before obeying the officer's signal to stop.

Another time, police stopped him five blocks from his home. After stopping initially, Heiple drove away without permission. He said it was a misunderstanding. Citing hearing difficulties, he said, "It's possible the police officer did say, 'Hold on' and I heard, 'Go on.'"
[Lying bastard!]

On a third occasion, officer David Belvery said that when he learned the driver was Heiple, he gave him a break and let him drive on. "I probably would have issued a citation if it had been anybody else," Belvery said. "When I found out it was a judge, I thought, 'I'm not going to piss him off. I might have to go in front of him in court.'
[Hey, that sounds like my court-appointed, conflict-of-interest shyster John Miller Carroll, who did not properly question Bitch Becker while she was under oath during the federal trial: "You understand, Rey, that I can't be too rough on her. I have to appear in front of her in court." And, "I don't want to piss off Stadtmueller."]

Three times when Heiple was stopped by the cops, he flashed his court identification to avert speeding tickets. Heiple said it was never his intention to abuse his position.
[Fucking liar!] He did not tell or ask any of the officers to give him a break. They did so on their own, he said, and now he wishes they hadn't. [Can you believe this bullshitting piece of garbage!?] - (Source: Chicago Tribune, 7 April 1997)

Whacking Off and Lying
Hugh Black, a Berrien County (Mich.) District Court judge since 1973, resigned just hours after a newspaper obtained records showing he had dialed phone sex services (at a cost of several dollars per minute) 124 times from his courthouse phone. On 20 May 1997, he made 22 calls, including twelve from 9:55 a.m. until noon. His Honor said in a statement that he was quitting his job "due to continuing difficulties with my hearing.''
[Yeah, right, you goddamn liar! Besides, I thought whacking off makes you go blind, not deaf.] - (Source: Associated Press, 13 June 1997)

Meanwhile, I've read many more news reports about criminal misdeeds by judges and other legal scum. One could fill a huge Web site just documenting those legal swines' crimes.

Clicky